GS I–III answers
Reviewed for question demand, reasoning, coverage and balance, evidence and examples, structure, and time discipline.
A 16-week GS Mains and Essay phase covering GS I, II, III and GS IV Ethics, then focused Prelims mentorship until 23 May 2027. You meet Akhil one-to-one every week, and every answer you submit is read by him personally.
Free sample evaluation of one GS answer for shortlisted applicants.
Credentials are self-reported and describe the mentor's own examinations; no selection or student outcome is implied.
Every mentoring week in your enrolled phase includes all six.
A fixed weekly slot with Akhil. The first is a 40-minute onboarding.
A written or voice-note exchange to correct priorities.
Live answer, essay and test discussion. Every clinic is recorded.
Questions answered within one working day, Monday to Saturday.
Completed work, recurring difficulties and next priorities, in writing.
A small, focused group for updates and peer learning.
How the 25 minutes are used: 5 to review progress and pick the key issue, 15 to work on an answer, essay, test pattern or obstacle, and 5 to agree next actions.
For aspirants with a basic foundation who want help deciding what to study, practising effectively and following through on feedback. Working aspirants and repeaters are welcome; your plan is built around your real hours.
12 October 2026 to 31 January 2027
1 February 2027 to Prelims on 23 May 2027
Every answer you write gets something back. One of each day's three is evaluated in full; the other two come with a model answer and the marking rubric to check your own work against, spot-checked twice a week. Sectional and full-length papers are evaluated in full.
GS IV module, weeks 13–16. Two answers and one case study every day, so the framework becomes second nature rather than something you improvise in the exam hall. It pays off twice: Prelims 2026 itself carried scenario questions of exactly this kind.
Ethics terms, determinants and consequences; Indian and Western thinkers applied to real dilemmas, not name-dropped.
Daily cases: conflict of interest, honesty under pressureAttitude, aptitude, emotional intelligence, and the foundational values of civil service.
Daily cases: empathy and compassion in service deliveryRTI, codes of conduct versus codes of ethics, corruption, and institutional integrity.
Daily cases: transparency, whistleblowing, procurementQuote-based questions, crisis dilemmas, and a full-length GS IV paper: 13 questions including 6 case studies in 3 hours.
Daily cases: disaster and crisis decisionsYour evaluation scores each of the five, so you see exactly where marks were lost, not just a number at the bottom.
Every review gives you two or three concrete corrections, and your rewrite is checked to confirm they landed.
Reviewed for question demand, reasoning, coverage and balance, evidence and examples, structure, and time discipline.
Theory answers that apply thinkers rather than name-drop them, and case studies: stakeholders, options, public-service values and a justified decision.
One skill per fortnight, from interpreting the topic and building an argument to nuance, flow and timed independent writing. Each outline becomes a full essay the next week.
Every mistake is classified first: knowledge gap, recall gap, misreading, reasoning or attempt error, or timing. Then the strategy changes.
“You describe the policy but not its limitations. Add two implementation constraints, link each to its effect, and end with a practical improvement.”Illustrative feedback. The rewrite check then asks whether that analysis is now present.
| Monday | Study the day's micro-topic; write 3 answers | Weekly plan and question set |
| Tuesday | Study; write 3 answers | One of Monday's three evaluated in full |
| Wednesday | Study; write 3 answers | Midweek check; spot-check of self-marked work |
| Thursday | Study; write 3 answers | Your 1:1 meeting, in a fixed slot |
| Friday | Study; write 3 answers | Week's evaluations returned |
| Saturday | Sectional test: 5 questions, 60 minutes | Group clinic; whole test evaluated |
| Sunday | Essay or outline (alternating); rewrite one evaluated answer | Rewrite checked against the original feedback |
Answers take about 60–75 minutes a day, plus the Saturday test and Sunday essay. Every fourth week is a consolidation week: no new daily answers, a full-length paper instead, and room to revise.
Capped at 12 active students across all options, so every student gets real attention.
Both phases, from 12 October 2026 until Prelims 2027.
Both phases, from 12 October 2026 until Prelims 2027.
The 16-week phase with all its evaluations and meetings.
The Prelims and CSAT phase only, from 1 February 2027.
Taught in English. The total payable, including any applicable tax, is confirmed before payment; no payment is taken on this website. Programme terms and refund policy
Applying is free and commits you to nothing. It helps me understand where you are, and whether the programme is right for you.
Prefer to ask first? Message Akhil on Telegram.
Yes. Akhil conducts every 1:1 meeting and personally reviews every included submission. There are no outsourced evaluators.
Calls use your fixed weekly slot. Between meetings you have the midweek check and direct messages, answered within one working day, Monday to Saturday. On-demand calls aren't included; that's what keeps every student's weekly slot reliable.
Three 10-mark answers take about 60–75 minutes once you stop over-reading before writing, which is the habit the programme is built to break. Writing runs Monday to Friday only; weekends are for the test, the essay and revision; and every fourth week has no new daily answers at all. If your week collapses, tell Akhil early and the next plan keeps the answers that matter most rather than pretending you'll catch up on all 15.
Many do, with an agreed reduction: two answers a day instead of three, the full Saturday test, and the essay fortnightly. You keep every evaluation and meeting; only the daily volume changes. Your plan is set around your real hours at onboarding, not a standard timetable.
No, and any mentor who promises that for a cohort is not being straight with you. Akhil evaluates 200 of them in full: one of each day's three, every sectional test answer and every full-length paper. The other two answers each day come with a model answer and the same marking rubric he uses, so you can mark your own work; he spot-checks that self-marking twice a week and picks up patterns in your 1:1.
Tell Akhil what you completed and what blocked you; the next plan keeps the most valuable tasks and drops duplication. Each 1:1 can be rescheduled once with 24 hours' notice. Late submissions are reviewed only if time allows, and weekly allowances don't carry forward.
Everything is in English. Every group clinic is recorded and shared within about 48 hours, and stays available until 30 days after the programme ends. 1:1 meetings aren't recorded unless we both agree.
Yes. Weeks 13–16 of Phase 1 focus on GS IV: ethics concepts and thinkers, integrity and public-service values, and case studies (stakeholders, options and a justified decision), ending with a six-answer GS IV assessment. Ethics answers are evaluated and rewritten like every other GS answer.
No. This is a preparation and feedback programme. You study from agreed standard sources; the roadmap organises your study, practice and feedback. It doesn't replace foundation teaching, and optional-subject mentoring isn't included.
For Mains, yes: the daily question sets, 12 sectional tests and 4 full-length papers are written for the programme and included. A notes library is not. For Prelims, use your own legally accessed test series or PRISM's free daily quiz; a commercial Prelims test series is not supplied.
The complete programme ends at Prelims 2027. Any post-Prelims Mains programme would be offered separately.
No, and no honest mentor can promise that. Progress depends on your preparation, how you apply feedback, and the examination itself.